A comment that reads "MUST stay in lockstep with TryGetActiveCrossfade (K8)"
helps nobody outside the plan that used to have a K8 in it, and the plans are
not in this repo. Same for "Spec FR-4", "plan §B.2", "Sub-Task 4.4" and the
F/R/M/A/S round codes scattered through the style engine and the self-tests.
Personal names go too. "tester feedback from Jin (v1.4.7)" and "Flo decision
2026-06-15" carry the reason fine without naming anyone -- the version and the
reason are the parts a reader can act on, and a public repo should not need a
cast list to be read.
The rule applied throughout: keep the why, drop the reference. Version numbers
stay, since those resolve through the changelog. 77 files.
ChunkUtil also carried 281 lines of commented-out code -- an older ToChunks
variant and two helpers with no callers, inherited and never removed. Deleted;
git remembers them.
JonKazama-Hellion
5b738e6885